R v Lee

Case

[2018] NSWDC 84

23 February 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Lee [2018] NSWDC 84 [2018] NSWDC 84 23 February 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Lee, the defendant was charged with the supply of prohibited drugs and dealing with the proceeds of crime. The case was heard in the Local Court, where the defendant had previously been dealt with via a section 9 bond. The case proceeded to the District Court for sentencing on these charges. The defendant had been in custody at the time of the offending and had been subject to a section 9 bond. His health had improved while in custody. The court needed to consider the harm caused by the defendant's drug supply.

The court was required to determine an appropriate sentence for the defendant's drug supply and dealing with the proceeds of crime. The court considered the harm caused by the defendant's drug supply, his health improvement while in custody, and the fact that he was subject to a section 9 bond at the time of the offending. The court also had to consider the Form 1 matters for the offence of ongoing drug supply.

The court held that the defendant's drug supply had caused harm in the community. However, the defendant's health had improved while in custody, and he had been subject to a section 9 bond at the time of the offending. The court considered these factors in determining the appropriate sentence. The court imposed a period of imprisonment of six months for the drug supply dealt with in the Local Court initially by the section 9 bond. The court also imposed a sentence of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of two years and a head sentence of four years for the ongoing drug supply. The court took into account all relevant factors in determining the appropriate sentence for the defendant.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Sentence

  • Breach of Bond

  • Ongoing Drug Supply

  • Prohibited Drugs

  • Proceeds of Crime

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0