R v Laycock & Stokes
Case
•
[1999] QCA 307
•6/08/1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Laycock and Stokes [1999] QCA 307
[1999] QCA 307
6/08/1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants in this case, Laycock and Stokes, were convicted of murder and manslaughter respectively in relation to the death of Darryl Lewis, who was killed by a fatal blow to the head with a baseball bat after an evening of violence by members of the Finks Motorcycle Club. Laycock was convicted of murder and Stokes of manslaughter. Both appeal against their convictions, and Stokes also seeks leave to appeal against his sentence. The central issues for the court to decide were whether the convictions were unsafe and unsatisfactory, whether the judge adequately warned the jury about the evidence of co-offenders, whether the Crown established that the blows at the side of the road caused the death, and whether the judge provided adequate directions as to causation and the drawing of inferences. The court considered the evidence and submissions made by the appellants, including the argument that the prosecution did not establish that the actions at the side of the road contributed significantly to the death. The court also examined the directions given by the judge to the jury regarding the test for causation and the drawing of inferences from the evidence. After reviewing the evidence and arguments, the court found that the convictions were safe and satisfactory, and that the judge's directions to the jury were adequate. The court therefore dismissed the appeals against conviction and sentence.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Breach of Contract
-
Causation
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Laycock and Stokes [1999] QCA 307
Most Recent Citation
R v J, SM [2013] SASCFC 96
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Harriman v the Queen
[1989] HCA 50
R v J, SM
[2013] SASCFC 96
R v J, SM
[2013] SASCFC 96
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
0
Guest v The Nominal Defendant
[2006] NSWCA 77
Crofts v The Queen
[1996] HCA 22
R v Apostilides
[1984] HCA 38