R v Lawrence No. DCCRM-03-530

Case [2003] SADC 112


R v LAWRENCE
[2003] SADC 112

Judge Allan
Criminal

  1. Michael Lawrence, you have applied to the court for the fixing of a non-parole period.

  2. On 24 June 1997, in this Court, you received a head sentence of three years, six months and 13 days with a non-parole period of 20 months for the offences of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, two counts of larceny and two counts of illegal use of a motor vehicle. You were released on parole on 23 February 1999.  Your parole expired on 5 January 2001.

  3. You breached conditions of your parole on 9 June 1999 by failing to report, breaching a residence condition, and driving without a licence.

  4. You were taken back into custody on 17 March this year.  As a result of the breaches of your parole, you are liable to serve one year, five months and 27 days from 17 March this year, if a new non-parole period is not set by the court.   You would be due for release on or about 13 September next year. In effect, you seek a further non-parole period in respect of the sentence imposed on 24 June 1997.

  5. On 17 June 2002, in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, you received sentences of imprisonment for a large number of offences including larceny, particularly larceny of motor vehicles, and driving offences, including unlicensed driving. The sentence of imprisonment you were sentenced to was to be served concurrently. You served about nine months.  On your release, you were extradited to Adelaide; and that is how you came to be imprisoned here on 17 March.

  6. You are currently facing charges in the Holden Hill Magistrates Court. The charges relate to offences allegedly committed while you were on parole. As I understand it, the offences are alleged to have occurred at various times in 1999, before you went to Victoria. I also understand that you will be pleading guilty to some of the charges you face. The commission of those offences would be further breaches of your parole.

  7. You have a number of previous convictions going back over many years. No useful purpose would be served in going through them.  They were dealt with by the judge who sentenced you in this Court on 24 June 1997; although I mention that the offences for which you were sentenced on that date seem to have been committed while you were on parole; and, when sentencing you, the judge said that “you have treated the law with a good deal of contempt”.

  8. Your offending has largely been committed to support your drug habit: you are an addict of long-standing. Whilst in prison in Victoria, you underwent an intensive drug treatment program and it is said you are currently not taking illicit substances. The substantial reason advanced for the fixing of a non-parole period at this time is that you will be seeking a referral to the Drug Court in relation to some of the offences currently before the Magistrates Court; a program which is aimed at rehabilitation.

  9. The Parole Board is of the view that you are not a good candidate for parole, and I must agree. On the material before me, I am not satisfied that it is appropriate to fix another non-parole period in respect of the sentence you are currently serving. Accordingly, your application is refused.

Details
AGLC
R v Lawrence No. DCCRM-03-530 [2003] SADC 112
Case
[2003] SADC 112
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Court was an application by Michael Lawrence to have a non-parole period fixed for a sentence imposed on him on 24 June 1997 for assault occasioning actual bodily harm, two counts of larceny, and two counts of illegal use of a motor vehicle. The applicant had been released on parole on 23 February 1999 and had breached the conditions of his parole on 9 June 1999. He was taken back into custody on 17 March 2002 and was currently facing charges in the Holden Hill Magistrates Court for offences allegedly committed while on parole. The applicant sought to have a non-parole period fixed in respect of the sentence imposed on 24 June 1997.

The central issue before the Court was whether to fix a non-parole period in respect of the sentence imposed on the applicant on 24 June 1997. The Court had to consider the applicant's history of offending, his drug addiction, and the likelihood of his rehabilitation. The Court also had to consider the Parole Board's view that the applicant was not a good candidate for parole.

The Court found that the applicant had a long history of offending, particularly related to his drug addiction. While the applicant had undergone a drug treatment program in prison, the Court was not satisfied that it was appropriate to fix another non-parole period in respect of the sentence he was currently serving. The Court noted that the Parole Board was of the view that the applicant was not a good candidate for parole, and the Court agreed with this assessment. The Court also noted that the applicant was currently facing charges in the Holden Hill Magistrates Court for offences allegedly committed while on parole, which would be further breaches of his parole. The Court ultimately refused the applicant's application for a non-parole period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.