R v HBV

Case

[2019] QCA 21

19 February 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v HBV [2019] QCA 21 [2019] QCA 21 19 February 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this case, the applicant, HBV, sought leave to appeal against the sentence imposed by the trial judge. HBV was a juvenile who was convicted of one count of armed robbery with actual violence committed in company. The applicant was sentenced to nine months detention. The appeal was based on the contention that the trial judge erred in considering irrelevant matters and that the sentence was manifestly excessive. The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or inadequate, and if the trial judge had erred in considering irrelevant matters.

The Court of Appeal considered whether the sentence imposed by the trial judge was manifestly excessive or inadequate. The Court noted that the trial judge had considered a number of matters that were not relevant to the sentencing process. The Court held that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and that the trial judge had erred in considering irrelevant matters. The Court of Appeal concluded that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and that the applicant was entitled to appeal against the sentence.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and confirmed the sentence of detention of nine months. However, the Court suspended the detention order and released the applicant from detention immediately. The Court ordered that the applicant be subject to a conditional release order for a period of three months. The Court further ordered that the applicant must participate in a program directed by the Chief Executive of Youth Justice Services, must abstain from violation of the law, comply with reasonable directions, report and receive visits as directed, notify the Chief Executive of any changes to address, employment or school, and must not leave or stay out of Queensland without prior approval. The Court did not record a conviction against the applicant.

The final orders of the Court of Appeal were that leave to appeal was granted, the appeal was allowed, the sentence of detention of nine months was confirmed, the detention order was suspended and the applicant was immediately released from detention, a conditional release order was made for a period of three months, and a conviction was not recorded.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Jurisdiction

  • Sentencing

  • Miscarriage of Justice

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v WBP [2022] QCA 9

Cases Citing This Decision

4

R v WBP [2022] QCA 9
R v CCS [2021] QCA 231
R v WBP [2022] QCA 9
Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

1

PNJ v The Queen [2009] HCA 6
R v SCU [2017] QCA 198