R v Gogani
Case
•
[2013] NSWDC 280
•09 August 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Gogani [2013] NSWDC 280
[2013] NSWDC 280
09 August 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant was convicted on two counts: conspiracy to break and enter and commit a serious indictable offence, and larceny. The matter came before the court for the purpose of sentencing following a trial in the Supreme Court. The central legal issues the court had to address were the appropriate length of the sentence and the non-parole period, taking into account the gravity of the offence, the appellant's lack of contrition, and any special circumstances.
The court noted that the appellant had no previous convictions and had expressed remorse, albeit belatedly. However, the court found that the appellant's lack of contrition throughout the investigation and trial process was a significant aggravating factor. The court also considered the seriousness of the offences, which involved breaking and entering and stealing from a residence, as well as the impact on the victim. The court determined that a substantial sentence was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the crimes and to deter the appellant and others from engaging in similar conduct.
The court ultimately sentenced the appellant to a term of imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months for the first count, with a non-parole period of 4 years and 9 months, and a term of 1 year and 6 months for the second count, to run concurrently. The court's decision emphasised the importance of imposing a sentence that appropriately reflects the gravity of the offences and the appellant's conduct.
ORDERS:
Count 1 - Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months with a non parole period of 4 years and 9 months.
Count 2 - Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.
The court noted that the appellant had no previous convictions and had expressed remorse, albeit belatedly. However, the court found that the appellant's lack of contrition throughout the investigation and trial process was a significant aggravating factor. The court also considered the seriousness of the offences, which involved breaking and entering and stealing from a residence, as well as the impact on the victim. The court determined that a substantial sentence was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the crimes and to deter the appellant and others from engaging in similar conduct.
The court ultimately sentenced the appellant to a term of imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months for the first count, with a non-parole period of 4 years and 9 months, and a term of 1 year and 6 months for the second count, to run concurrently. The court's decision emphasised the importance of imposing a sentence that appropriately reflects the gravity of the offences and the appellant's conduct.
ORDERS:
Count 1 - Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 7 years and 6 months with a non parole period of 4 years and 9 months.
Count 2 - Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Breach of Contract
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Gogani [2013] NSWDC 280
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
1
Pettersen v The Queen
[2013] NSWCCA 20
Dui Kol v R
[2015] NSWCCA 150
Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57