R v Davis
Case
•
[2021] ACTSC 335
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Davis [2021] ACTSC 335
[2021] ACTSC 335
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Davis, the offender pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including aggravated burglary, strangulation, property damage, assault, animal cruelty, and possession of a weapon with intent. Refshauge AJ sentenced the offender to a total of three years and eight months imprisonment, with a drug and alcohol treatment order to be imposed for 18 months from the date of sentencing. The offender's sentences were backdated to account for the time already spent in custody. The treatment order incorporated the convictions and sentences for all the offences and was to be suspended until the offender's release date. The offender was also required to comply with good behaviour obligations and accept supervision by the Commissioner of ACT Corrective Services. Refshauge AJ considered the offender's disadvantaged childhood, limited employment history, and substance abuse issues in determining the sentence and treatment order. The judge emphasised the importance of rehabilitation and regular check-ins to monitor the offender's progress.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Jurisdiction
-
Causation
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Restitution
-
Specific Performance
-
Standing
-
Criminal Liability
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Davis [2021] ACTSC 335
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Higgins (No 3) [2025] ACTSC 309
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Director of Public Prosecutions v Higgins (No 3)
[2025] ACTSC 309
R v Reid (No 1)
[2021] ACTSC 334
Director of Public Prosecutions v Higgins (No 3)
[2025] ACTSC 309
Cases Cited
27
Statutory Material Cited
0
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
DPP v Derby
[2007] VSCA 92
Grimshaw v Mann
[2013] ACTSC 189