R v Davidson
Case
•
[2014] SASCFC 120
•13 November 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Davidson [2014] SASCFC 120
[2014] SASCFC 120
13 November 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned the sentence imposed on the defendant by the District Court for the offences of culpable driving causing death and resisting police. The defendant had pleaded guilty to both charges. The sentencing judge imposed a single sentence of four years imprisonment, reduced from five years due to the guilty pleas, with a non-parole period of two years and four months. The judge declined to suspend the sentence and backdated it to the date of arrest.
The legal issues before the appellate court were whether the sentencing judge had erred in the exercise of their discretion in imposing the sentence, and whether permission to appeal should be granted on a further proposed ground of appeal. The facts giving rise to the charges involved a police pursuit of the defendant, who was the subject of an active parole warrant. During the pursuit, the defendant drove at excessive speeds, crossed onto the wrong side of the road, and ultimately collided head-on with another vehicle, causing death. Following the collision, the defendant resisted arrest by kicking at and tensing his body to prevent police from handcuffing him.
The appellate court found that the sentencing judge had applied correct sentencing principles, considered relevant materials, and disregarded irrelevant ones. The court concluded that the sentence imposed was well within the sentencing judge's discretion.
Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and permission to appeal was refused.
The legal issues before the appellate court were whether the sentencing judge had erred in the exercise of their discretion in imposing the sentence, and whether permission to appeal should be granted on a further proposed ground of appeal. The facts giving rise to the charges involved a police pursuit of the defendant, who was the subject of an active parole warrant. During the pursuit, the defendant drove at excessive speeds, crossed onto the wrong side of the road, and ultimately collided head-on with another vehicle, causing death. Following the collision, the defendant resisted arrest by kicking at and tensing his body to prevent police from handcuffing him.
The appellate court found that the sentencing judge had applied correct sentencing principles, considered relevant materials, and disregarded irrelevant ones. The court concluded that the sentence imposed was well within the sentencing judge's discretion.
Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and permission to appeal was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Charge
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Davidson [2014] SASCFC 120
Most Recent Citation
Geoffrey William Rowling and Dialaphone Communications Pty Ltd v Peter Murray No. SCGRG 92/2778 Judgment No. 4132 Number of Pages 8 Customs [1993] SASC 4132
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1