R v Chmieluk; Ex parte

Case

[2018] QCA 271

16 October 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Chmieluk; Ex parte [2018] QCA 271 [2018] QCA 271 16 October 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant sought an appeal against the sentence of the respondent who had pleaded guilty to one count of dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death while adversely affected by an intoxicating substance. The respondent was sentenced to five years imprisonment to be suspended after three months with an operational period of five years. The respondent caused the death of her sister after crashing a vehicle, whilst under the influence of alcohol, in which her sister was an occupant. The respondent had a lengthy history of traffic infringements but had demonstrated genuine insight into her offending and had made substantial efforts at rehabilitation between the time of the offence and sentence. The killing of her sister had a significant effect on the respondent.

The central issue for the court was whether the lenience afforded to the respondent by the sentencing judge was not in the public interest, such that the sentence was manifestly inadequate and a more severe penalty ought to have been imposed. The court examined the appellant's submission that the sentence was primarily driven by considerations of general deterrence, denunciation and comparison with previous sentences in cases of this kind. The court found that while general deterrence and denunciation were relevant considerations, they were not determinative of the appropriate sentence in this case. The court also considered the respondent's history of offending, her genuine insight into her offending, and her efforts at rehabilitation. The court held that the sentence imposed was not manifestly inadequate and was in the public interest.

The court dismissed the appeal against the sentence, finding that the sentence imposed was appropriate and not manifestly inadequate. The court acknowledged the tragic nature of the incident and the significant effect it had on the respondent but held that the sentence reflected the relevant considerations and was not an abuse of the court's discretion.

No further orders were made by the court.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

  • Manifestly Inadequate Sentence

  • General Deterrence

  • Specific Performance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v Farkas [2023] QCA 84

Cases Citing This Decision

8

R v Farkas [2023] QCA 84
R v Itshaky [2019] QCA 168
Cases Cited

16

Statutory Material Cited

0

R v Phillips [2008] QCA 284
R v Hook [2006] QCA 458
R v Hook [2006] QCA 458