R v Chami; R v Hassoun; R v Halloum

Case

[2021] NSWDC 519

18 June 2021


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Chami; R v Hassoun; R v Halloum [2021] NSWDC 519 [2021] NSWDC 519 18 June 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The three appellants were convicted of various drug-related offences, including supplying large commercial quantities of prohibited drugs. The case was heard by the Supreme Court of Victoria, which was tasked with determining their appropriate sentences. The central legal issues revolved around the principles of sentencing for drug offences, particularly in relation to the objective seriousness of the crime, the objective and subjective factors to consider in sentencing, and the need to ensure parity between co-offenders.

The court had to weigh the objective seriousness of the crimes against the mitigating factors presented by the appellants, such as their rehabilitation efforts, remorse, and good character. Additionally, the court had to balance the deterrent effect of the sentences with the individual circumstances of each appellant. The court considered the maximum penalties applicable for the offences and the need to ensure that the sentences reflected the gravity of the crimes and provided a sufficient deterrent.

The court found that the appellants' actions demonstrated a significant breach of public trust and had serious implications for the community. Despite acknowledging the mitigating factors presented by the appellants, the court determined that the sentences should reflect the objective seriousness of the crimes and ensure general deterrence. The court also considered the need for parity between the co-offenders, taking into account their respective roles in the offences. Ultimately, the court imposed varying sentences, with non-parole periods reflecting the seriousness of the crimes and the mitigating factors presented by each appellant.

The final orders of the court were as follows: Halloum was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eight years and three months with a non-parole period of five years; Chami was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven years and 10 months with a non-parole period of four years and eight months; and Hassoun was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven years and six months with a non-parole period of four years and six months.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Drug offences

  • Imprisonment

  • Sentencing

  • Mitigating factors

  • Rehabilitation

  • Remorse

  • Good character

  • Relevant factors on sentence

  • Co-offenders

  • Parity

  • Deterrence

  • Form 1 offences

  • General principle

  • Objective seriousness

  • Sentencing procedure

  • Agreed facts

  • Subjective considerations on sentence

  • Drug addiction

  • Special circumstances

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Hassoun v The King [2023] NSWCCA 5

Cases Citing This Decision

12

R v Osman [2022] NSWDC 49
R v Hogan [2021] NSWDC 747
R v Naghdi [2021] NSWDC 635
Cases Cited

7

Statutory Material Cited

2

R v Barrientos [1999] NSWCCA 1
Hurmz v R [2017] NSWCCA 235
Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144