R v Burke

Case

[1994] QCA 244

12 July 1994


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Burke [1994] QCA 244 [1994] QCA 244 12 July 1994

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Burke is an appeal against sentence brought before the Supreme Court of Queensland. The applicant, Jayson Lee Burke, was convicted of robbery in company in the District Court and was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment with a recommendation for parole after serving 15 months. This offence was committed on 2 February 1992. While on bail for this offence, the applicant committed further offences in the Northern Territory, where he was subsequently convicted and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment for armed robbery and 9 months imprisonment for unlawful use of a motor vehicle, to be served cumulatively. The sentences were backdated to 30 March 1992, and a non-parole period of 18 months was ordered. Burke was transferred to Queensland under the Prisoners (Interstate Transfer) Act 1983 (N.T.).

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the non-parole periods imposed in both jurisdictions should be added together under section 157(6)(a) of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992, and whether the resulting sentence was manifestly excessive. The Court had to consider the application of the Prisoners (Interstate Transfer) Act 1982 (Qld) in determining the effect of the Northern Territory sentence on the Queensland sentence.

The Court found that the District Court should have applied section 157(3)(b) of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 when imposing the Queensland sentence, as the applicant was already serving a sentence imposed by a court of a participating State. The Court held that the non-parole period imposed in the Northern Territory must be added to that imposed in Queensland, resulting in a total non-parole period of 33 months. The Court concluded that the imposition of an additional non-parole period of 15 months was not manifestly excessive, given the circumstances of the offence and the applicant's criminal history.

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal against sentence, finding that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The applicant's sentence of 4 years imprisonment with a recommendation for parole after serving 15 months, along with the cumulative non-parole period of 33 months, was deemed to be an appropriate punishment for the offence committed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Sentence

  • Non-parole Period

  • Parole

  • Interstate Transfer

  • Cumulative Sentences

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v RW [2005] QCA 72

Cases Citing This Decision

4

Davis v The Queen [2002] WASCA 298
R v RW [2005] QCA 72
Davis v The Queen [2002] WASCA 298
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0