R v Buenconsejo
Case
•
[2014] NSWDC 192
•03 July 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Buenconsejo [2014] NSWDC 192
[2014] NSWDC 192
03 July 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The defendant, Buenconsejo, was charged with attempting to import a marketable quantity of a border-controlled drug. The court heard that the defendant had attempted to collect 559.5 grams of methamphetamine concealed within a consignment. The defendant had previously worked for the delivery company and therefore had knowledge of its procedures. The defendant provided assistance to the authorities and gave an undertaking for further assistance. The court considered the defendant's prospects of rehabilitation.
The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence for the defendant's crime. The defence argued that the defendant had provided assistance to the authorities and had good prospects of rehabilitation. The prosecution argued that the defendant's crime was serious and that a significant sentence was necessary to deter others from engaging in similar criminal activity.
The court considered the defendant's previous employment with the delivery company and the knowledge they had of its procedures. The court also considered the defendant's assistance to the authorities and their prospects of rehabilitation. The court ultimately determined that the defendant's crime was serious and that a significant sentence was necessary to deter others from engaging in similar criminal activity. However, the court also considered the defendant's assistance to the authorities and their prospects of rehabilitation. The court sentenced the defendant to two years and six months imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after one year and three months.
The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence for the defendant's crime. The defence argued that the defendant had provided assistance to the authorities and had good prospects of rehabilitation. The prosecution argued that the defendant's crime was serious and that a significant sentence was necessary to deter others from engaging in similar criminal activity.
The court considered the defendant's previous employment with the delivery company and the knowledge they had of its procedures. The court also considered the defendant's assistance to the authorities and their prospects of rehabilitation. The court ultimately determined that the defendant's crime was serious and that a significant sentence was necessary to deter others from engaging in similar criminal activity. However, the court also considered the defendant's assistance to the authorities and their prospects of rehabilitation. The court sentenced the defendant to two years and six months imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after one year and three months.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Buenconsejo [2014] NSWDC 192
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2