R v Batt

Case [2001] QCA 388


[2001] QCA 388

COURT OF APPEAL

WILLIAMS JA
CHESTERMAN J
ATKINSON J

CA No 379 of 2000

THE QUEEN

v.

MATTHEW GORDON BATT              Appellant

BRISBANE

..DATE 14/09/2001

ORDER

WILLIAMS JA:  I think that is the view that, at this stage, has been expressed by at least two members of this Court and I think Justice Chesterman is really of a similar view.  But it does seem to me that in the interests of justice the appeal should not be summarily dismissed at this stage.

MS CLARE:  They are serious charges, that is so.

WILLIAMS JA:  Yes, yes.

MR WHITE:  Your Honour, perhaps I should indicate that Ms Clare did make the point she did to me before.  It is not appropriate to rely upon double hearsay in those circumstances.  It is not germane to the matter in any way.

WILLIAMS JA:  Well, now, I do understand from the Registry, and I want you to listen carefully to this Mr Batt, I do understand from the Registry that the matter can be listed very early in November.  Now, the matter should proceed then.  That will be the third time that it has been listed.  What I propose to do is to make some directions:

(1)Firstly, particulars of the contention that the verdict is unsafe, unsound and unreasonable should be suppled by 5 October;

(2)That any affidavits relating to fresh evidence and grounds on which the application to adduce fresh evidence will be based should be also filed by that date, 5 October;

If the appellant is to conduct his own case, if that is what should ultimately happen, then the record book should be supplied to the appellant by 12 October at the latest and an outline of submissions should be submitted by 17 October.  Now, Mr Batt, you heard what I said?

PRISONER:  Yes, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  Now, it is up to you to co-operate with your solicitors and to ensure that they meet those deadlines.  If you do no co-operate or if for any reason the solicitors do not proceed with acting on your behalf then you will have to argue any appeal on your own and that will mean, as I say, your having to prepare an outline and submit to the Court by 17 October;  do you understand that?

PRISONER:  Yes, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  The directions that I have indicated should also contain a provision:

That any additional grounds of appeal should be particularised by 5 October.

So, the first direction will be "particulars of the contention that the verdict is unsafe and unreasonable and any additional grounds of appeal should be provided by 5 October.  Anything further that you would seek by way of directions, Ms Clare?

MS CLARE:  No, thank you, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  I will also direct that a copy of the directions order made today be sent to the appellant personally at Lotus Glen so he is fully appraised of the situation, Mr White.

MR WHITE:  Yes, thank you, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  Well, the directions will be as I have indicated and the matter will be adjourned to a date to be fixed.  We will now terminate the link with you, Mr Batt.  There is nothing you want to say to the Court at this stage?

PRISONER:  Would Mr Bax be in the courtroom?

WILLIAMS JA:  Sorry?

PRISONER:  Would my barrister, Mr Bax, is he in the courtroom now?

WILLIAMS JA:  He is in the courtroom, yes.

MR WHITE:  Not Mr Bax, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  Sorry, not Mr Bax.  Mr White is appearing.  He is from Baker Johnson, the same firm, as Mr Bax.  Well, any rate they will be in‑‑‑‑‑

PRISONER:  Right.

WILLIAMS JA:  They will be in touch with you and you will get a copy of the directions and you understand the position.  You will have to be ready to proceed on the date in early November.  You understand that? 

PRISONER:  Yes, your Honour.

WILLIAMS JA:  All right.  We can now terminate the video link and the directions will be as I have indicated.

-----

Details
AGLC
R v Batt [2001] QCA 388
Case
[2001] QCA 388
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter in R v Batt involved an appeal by the appellant, Matthew Gordon Batt, against his conviction and sentence. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal in Queensland, with Williams JA, Chesterman J, and Atkinson JCA presiding. The central issue in this appeal was whether the verdict was unsafe and unreasonable, and whether there were grounds for admitting fresh evidence. The appellant had been convicted of serious criminal charges and was appealing on the basis of the unreliability of the verdict and the potential for new evidence to be introduced.

The court considered the appellant's argument that the verdict was unsafe and unreasonable, and whether there were grounds for admitting fresh evidence. The court was satisfied that the appellant's case warranted a full hearing, despite the gravity of the charges against him. The court made several directions to ensure the efficient progression of the appeal, including the requirement for particulars of the contention that the verdict was unsafe, unsound and unreasonable, as well as any affidavits relating to fresh evidence and grounds on which the application to adduce fresh evidence would be based. The court also directed that the record book be supplied to the appellant by a certain date and that an outline of submissions be submitted by another specified date. The court emphasized the importance of the appellant cooperating with his solicitors to meet these deadlines.

The court issued a directions order, specifying the deadlines for the filing of particulars of the contention that the verdict was unsafe, unsound and unreasonable, any affidavits relating to fresh evidence, and any additional grounds of appeal. The court also directed that a copy of the directions order be sent to the appellant personally to ensure that he was fully aware of the situation. The matter was adjourned to a date to be fixed, with the court indicating that the appeal would proceed in early November. The appellant was instructed to be prepared to proceed on the scheduled date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.