R v Barker, Jarrod
Case
•
[2013] NSWSC 1934
•19 December 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Barker, Jarrod [2013] NSWSC 1934
[2013] NSWSC 1934
19 December 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Jarrod Barker was in custody and subject to the revocation of parole when he applied for bail. The applicant argued that he was entitled to be released on bail under section 9(4) of the Bail Act. The matter was heard in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. The legal issues that the court had to address were whether the applicant was eligible for bail under the Act and whether the application was made within the prescribed time limit.
The court found that the applicant had not made his application for bail within the prescribed time limit under section 9(4) of the Bail Act. As a result, the court refused to grant bail to the applicant. The court emphasised that the statutory provisions regarding bail applications were mandatory and that the applicant had not complied with the requirements of the Act. The court held that it did not have the discretion to grant bail to the applicant in these circumstances. The applicant's bail application was dismissed.
The court found that the applicant had not made his application for bail within the prescribed time limit under section 9(4) of the Bail Act. As a result, the court refused to grant bail to the applicant. The court emphasised that the statutory provisions regarding bail applications were mandatory and that the applicant had not complied with the requirements of the Act. The court held that it did not have the discretion to grant bail to the applicant in these circumstances. The applicant's bail application was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Bail
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Barker, Jarrod [2013] NSWSC 1934
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
2
Commissioner of Police v Gray
[2008] NSWSC 414
Commissioner of Police v Gray
[2008] NSWSC 414