R v Barden
Case
•
[2015] NSWDC 395
•02 December 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Barden [2015] NSWDC 395
[2015] NSWDC 395
02 December 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Barden, the offender was charged with multiple offences including the supply of 8.28 grams of "Nexus", possession of 0.66 grams of Ecstasy, possession of 0.13 grams of cocaine, dealing with property that there were reasonable grounds to believe were the proceeds of crime, and public urination. The offender was arrested for public urination at a train station and subsequently found to be in possession of drugs and cash. The offender claimed that he obtained the drugs for a friend to take to a party in Bondi. He was in the company of friends, travelling to Bondi to attend a concert or dance party, and it was inferred that he purchased the Nexus tablets to pass them on to members of his group to be consumed at the event. The circumstances of the offending did not suggest any commercial operation or trafficking.
The legal issues before the court involved the sentencing of the offender for these multiple charges. The court had to consider the nature and circumstances of the offending, the offender's background, and the principles of sentencing. The court found that the offender, who was 25 years old at the time of the offending, had a history of drug abuse and a diagnosed stimulant use disorder. However, at the time of sentencing, the offender had been abstinent from illicit drugs for three months and was well-regarded by his employer, indicating a low risk of recidivism.
The court sentenced the offender to a term of imprisonment of one year, suspended pursuant to section 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1989. Additionally, a good behaviour bond for one year was imposed, and the charge contained on the s 166 certificate was dismissed. The court ordered that the cash found at Woolooware Railway Station on 1 April 2015 be forfeited to the Crown under section 18(1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, and leave was given for the $AUD200 to be disposed of forthwith under section 19(3)(a) of the same Act. The court also ordered that the drugs be destroyed.
The legal issues before the court involved the sentencing of the offender for these multiple charges. The court had to consider the nature and circumstances of the offending, the offender's background, and the principles of sentencing. The court found that the offender, who was 25 years old at the time of the offending, had a history of drug abuse and a diagnosed stimulant use disorder. However, at the time of sentencing, the offender had been abstinent from illicit drugs for three months and was well-regarded by his employer, indicating a low risk of recidivism.
The court sentenced the offender to a term of imprisonment of one year, suspended pursuant to section 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1989. Additionally, a good behaviour bond for one year was imposed, and the charge contained on the s 166 certificate was dismissed. The court ordered that the cash found at Woolooware Railway Station on 1 April 2015 be forfeited to the Crown under section 18(1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, and leave was given for the $AUD200 to be disposed of forthwith under section 19(3)(a) of the same Act. The court also ordered that the drugs be destroyed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Breach of Contract
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Restitution