R v Al-Harazi (No 7)
Case
•
[2017] ACTSC 350
•10 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Al-Harazi (No 7) [2017] ACTSC 350
[2017] ACTSC 350
10 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case before the court was an appeal against sentence by the respondent, Maged Mohammed Ahmed Al-Harazi, who was convicted of the murder of Sabah Al-Mdwali. The appeal was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary issue before the court was whether the sentence imposed on Al-Harazi was manifestly excessive or inadequate. The court was required to consider the nature and circumstances of the offence, including the offender's mental state at the time of the offence, the principles of sentencing for murder, and the appropriate non-parole period.
The court found that the offender had been found guilty of a family violence offence, which involved a high degree of premeditation and cruelty. The court noted that the offender had a history of violent behaviour towards the victim and that the victim had died as a result of multiple stab wounds. The court also considered the principles set out in Verdins, which provide that the sentence for murder should reflect the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the offender. The court found that the sentence of 30 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 21 years, was appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
The court rejected the argument that the sentence was manifestly excessive, noting that the sentence was within the range of sentences typically imposed for murder in Victoria. The court also rejected the argument that the sentence was inadequate, noting that the sentence reflected the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the offender. The court found that the sentence was proportionate to the gravity of the offence and that the non-parole period was appropriate to ensure that the offender would remain in custody for a sufficient period of time to protect the community.
The court dismissed the appeal against sentence and confirmed the sentence imposed by the trial judge. The orders of the court were that Maged Mohammed Ahmed Al-Harazi be convicted of the murder of Sabah Al-Mdwali, that he be sentenced to imprisonment for 30 years to commence on 17 March 2015, and that a non parole period be set to commence on 17 March 2015 and end on 16 March 2036.
The court found that the offender had been found guilty of a family violence offence, which involved a high degree of premeditation and cruelty. The court noted that the offender had a history of violent behaviour towards the victim and that the victim had died as a result of multiple stab wounds. The court also considered the principles set out in Verdins, which provide that the sentence for murder should reflect the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the offender. The court found that the sentence of 30 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 21 years, was appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
The court rejected the argument that the sentence was manifestly excessive, noting that the sentence was within the range of sentences typically imposed for murder in Victoria. The court also rejected the argument that the sentence was inadequate, noting that the sentence reflected the seriousness of the offence and the culpability of the offender. The court found that the sentence was proportionate to the gravity of the offence and that the non-parole period was appropriate to ensure that the offender would remain in custody for a sufficient period of time to protect the community.
The court dismissed the appeal against sentence and confirmed the sentence imposed by the trial judge. The orders of the court were that Maged Mohammed Ahmed Al-Harazi be convicted of the murder of Sabah Al-Mdwali, that he be sentenced to imprisonment for 30 years to commence on 17 March 2015, and that a non parole period be set to commence on 17 March 2015 and end on 16 March 2036.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Sentencing
-
Murder
-
Verdins principles
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Al-Harazi (No 7) [2017] ACTSC 350
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Lo [2025] ACTSC 218
Cases Citing This Decision
14
R v Newby
[2022] ACTCA 20
Al-Harazi v The Queen
[2018] ACTCA 40
Director of Public Prosecutions v Niatin
[2025] ACTSC 473
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
4
R v Bartlett
[2016] ACTSC 390
R v Hamid
[2006] NSWCCA 302
R v Edigarov
[2001] NSWCCA 436