| [2020] FWCA 2823 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Quingroup Labour Pty Ltd
(AG2020/1277)
QUINGROUP LABOUR SUB-DIVISION AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 1 JUNE 2020 |
Application for approval of the Quingroup Labour Sub-division Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Quingroup Labour Sub-division Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by Quingroup Labour Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s.191(2) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with The Australian Workers’ Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 June 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE508172 PR719764>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Quingroup Labour Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 2823
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 2823
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the proposed sub-division would result in any detrimental changes to the employees' working conditions and whether the agreement sufficiently safeguarded their rights. The court had to consider whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the principles of good faith bargaining and the preservation of employee protections. Furthermore, the court examined whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the necessity to provide for minimum terms and conditions.
The Fair Work Commission, after carefully reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, concluded that the Quingroup Labour Sub-division Agreement 2020 did not result in any adverse changes to the employees' working conditions and was in their best interests. The Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and complied with the statutory requirements. The Commission approved the agreement, emphasising the importance of maintaining a balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. The decision underscored the need for any changes to the sub-division to be in line with the principles of good faith bargaining and the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.