[2013] FWCA 706 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Queensland Police Citizens Youth Welfare Association - Bornhoffen Branch t/a Bornhoffen PCYC Leadership Development Centre
(AG2012/14302)
BORNHOFFEN PCYC LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Sporting organisations | |
COMMISSIONER ASBURY | BRISBANE, 31 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Bornhoffen PCYC Leadership Development Centre Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bornhoffen PCYC Leadership Development Centre Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Queensland Police Citizens Youth Welfare Association - Bornhoffen Branch t/a Bornhoffen PCYC Leadership Development Centre. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 30 January 2013 undertakings were provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 August 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899639 PR533674>
- AGLC
- Queensland Police Citizens Youth Welfare Association - Bornhoffen Branch t/a Bornhoffen PCYC Leadership Development Centre [2013] FWCA 706
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 706
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the proposed agreement was in compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of ensuring it did not prejudice employees unduly and whether it met the requirements for a "simple" agreement. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement met the "better off overall test", meaning that employees would not be worse off financially or in terms of conditions compared to what they had under the previous agreement or award.
The court found that the agreement was largely compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009. It considered the "better off overall test" and found that the proposed agreement provided employees with certain benefits, such as increased pay rates, which outweighed any disadvantages. The court also noted the parties' good faith in negotiating the agreement and the minimal impact on employees' overall conditions. Consequently, the court approved the application for the agreement, affirming its alignment with statutory requirements and its fair treatment of employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.