Queensland College of Teachers v BJH
Case
•
[2015] QCAT 356
•25 August 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Queensland College of Teachers v BJH [2015] QCAT 356
[2015] QCAT 356
25 August 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Queensland College of Teachers brought a case against BJH regarding their suitability to teach. BJH had engaged in various inappropriate relationships with students and former students, including inappropriate Facebook contact, sexual contact with a student, and an ongoing sexual relationship with a former student. BJH admitted to all the allegations. The case was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
The legal issues the tribunal had to decide were whether BJH's conduct warranted a prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher and what conditions should be attached to any future application for re-registration. The tribunal considered the nature of BJH's misconduct, their admissions, and the potential risk of reoffending.
The tribunal concluded that BJH's conduct was of a serious nature and warranted the prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. The tribunal also ordered that any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. Additionally, the tribunal imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.
The tribunal issued an order prohibiting BJH from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. Any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. The tribunal also imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.
The legal issues the tribunal had to decide were whether BJH's conduct warranted a prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher and what conditions should be attached to any future application for re-registration. The tribunal considered the nature of BJH's misconduct, their admissions, and the potential risk of reoffending.
The tribunal concluded that BJH's conduct was of a serious nature and warranted the prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. The tribunal also ordered that any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. Additionally, the tribunal imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.
The tribunal issued an order prohibiting BJH from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. Any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. The tribunal also imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Professional Regulation
Legal Concepts
-
Professional Standards
-
Unprofessional Conduct
-
Disciplinary Action
-
Public Interest
-
Rehabilitation
-
Professional Ethics
-
Re-registration
-
Psychological Assessment
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Queensland College of Teachers v Satora [2016] QCAT 411
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Queensland College of Teachers v CSK
[2016] QCATA 125
Queensland College of Teachers v Satora
[2016] QCAT 411
Queensland College of Teachers v DTJ
[2015] QCAT 443
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Thomas v Nielson
[2012] QCAT 225
Queensland College of Teachers v Genge
[2011] QCAT 163
Queensland College of Teachers v Chambers
[2012] QCAT 491