Queensland College of Teachers v BJH

Case

[2015] QCAT 356

25 August 2015


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Queensland College of Teachers v BJH [2015] QCAT 356 [2015] QCAT 356 25 August 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Queensland College of Teachers brought a case against BJH regarding their suitability to teach. BJH had engaged in various inappropriate relationships with students and former students, including inappropriate Facebook contact, sexual contact with a student, and an ongoing sexual relationship with a former student. BJH admitted to all the allegations. The case was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

The legal issues the tribunal had to decide were whether BJH's conduct warranted a prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher and what conditions should be attached to any future application for re-registration. The tribunal considered the nature of BJH's misconduct, their admissions, and the potential risk of reoffending.

The tribunal concluded that BJH's conduct was of a serious nature and warranted the prohibition from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. The tribunal also ordered that any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. Additionally, the tribunal imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.

The tribunal issued an order prohibiting BJH from reapplying for registration as a teacher until 5 December 2018. Any future application for re-registration must be accompanied by an independent psychologist report addressing several aspects of professional conduct and ethics. The tribunal also imposed a non-publication order to protect the identities of the students involved.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Professional Regulation

Legal Concepts

  • Professional Standards

  • Unprofessional Conduct

  • Disciplinary Action

  • Public Interest

  • Rehabilitation

  • Professional Ethics

  • Re-registration

  • Psychological Assessment

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

6

Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

0

Thomas v Nielson [2012] QCAT 225