| [2019] FWCA 5396 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics
(AG2019/2369)
QUBE LOGISTICS (SB) - PACKTAINERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER SPENCER | BRISBANE, 5 AUGUST 2019 |
Application for approval of the Qube Logistics (SB) - Packtainers Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Logistics (SB) - Packtainers Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it.
[3] In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement. The model consultation term is attached to the Agreement.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 August 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE504729 PR710975>
- AGLC
- Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics [2019] FWCA 5396
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 5396
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWC had to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms, and if it complied with the procedural requirements of the Act. The FWC also had to consider whether the agreement provided adequate protection for employees' wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment.
In its decision, the FWC found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not fully meet the statutory requirements. The FWC was concerned that the agreement did not adequately protect employees' wages and conditions, particularly in relation to overtime and shift patterns. The FWC also noted that the agreement did not provide sufficient protections for employees in the event of redundancy or termination. Consequently, the FWC refused to approve the enterprise agreement. The employer was required to renegotiate the agreement with the union to address these concerns.
No specific orders were made in this instance, but the employer was directed to return to the negotiating table to revise the agreement in light of the FWC's findings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.