Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (No 6)
Case
•
[2017] NSWCA 183
•25 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (No 6) [2017] NSWCA 183
[2017] NSWCA 183
25 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (No 6)*, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered applications by the applicant, Michael Quach, to re-open matters previously decided in judicial review proceedings and to make unfounded allegations of criminal contempt. The proceedings involved the applicant and the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission.
The Court was required to determine whether the applicant's notices of motion, filed subsequent to an earlier order, constituted vexatious proceedings and an abuse of process. Additionally, the Court considered whether orders should be made prohibiting the applicant from instituting or maintaining further proceedings related to the subject matter of the present proceedings, pursuant to the *Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008* (NSW).
The Court reasoned that the applicant's motions sought to re-litigate issues already determined and contained unsubstantiated allegations. Applying principles relating to vexatious litigants and abuse of process, the Court found that the notices of motion filed on 19 December 2016 and 14 March 2017 were vexatious and an abuse of process, and therefore dismissed them. The Court also refused the applicant leave to serve a notice to produce on the third respondent.
Furthermore, the Court ordered Michael Quach to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further motions in the Court of Appeal and from instituting proceedings in New South Wales relating to the subject matter of the proceedings before the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. The applicant was directed to file written submissions by 15 August 2017, with provisions for requesting an oral hearing.
The Court was required to determine whether the applicant's notices of motion, filed subsequent to an earlier order, constituted vexatious proceedings and an abuse of process. Additionally, the Court considered whether orders should be made prohibiting the applicant from instituting or maintaining further proceedings related to the subject matter of the present proceedings, pursuant to the *Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008* (NSW).
The Court reasoned that the applicant's motions sought to re-litigate issues already determined and contained unsubstantiated allegations. Applying principles relating to vexatious litigants and abuse of process, the Court found that the notices of motion filed on 19 December 2016 and 14 March 2017 were vexatious and an abuse of process, and therefore dismissed them. The Court also refused the applicant leave to serve a notice to produce on the third respondent.
Furthermore, the Court ordered Michael Quach to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further motions in the Court of Appeal and from instituting proceedings in New South Wales relating to the subject matter of the proceedings before the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. The applicant was directed to file written submissions by 15 August 2017, with provisions for requesting an oral hearing.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Quach v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Extension of Time) [2023] FCA 578
Cases Citing This Decision
5
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission; Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal
[2018] NSWCA 175
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission; Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal
[2017] NSWCA 267
Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (No 2)
[2017] NSWCA 182
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
3
Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 4)
[2011] NSWCA 324
Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 4)
[2011] NSWCA 324
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (No 3)
[2016] NSWCA 284