Qenos Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 6708


[2019] FWCA 6708 [Note: a correction has been issued to this document]
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qenos Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3175)

AMWU/CFMEU QENOS BOTANY OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC

MELBOURNE, 26 SEPTEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the AWUQenos Botany Operations Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AWUQenos Botany Operations Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qenos Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] The Notice of Employee Representational Rights distributed to employees contained a minor technical error, that being the omission of reference to the Fair Work Ombudsman in the final paragraph. In the circumstances and having regard to the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others, 1 I am satisfied that:

    a) this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and

    b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.

[4] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement was genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

[5] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[6] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, each being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have each given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[8] The Agreement was approved on 26 September 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE505481  PR712830>

Annexure A

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318

Details
AGLC
Qenos Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 6708
Case
[2019] FWCA 6708
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Qenos Pty Ltd, an employer, and the Australian Workers' Union (AWU) in relation to the approval of the AWUQenos Botany Operations Enterprise Agreement 2019. This application was made to the Fair Work Commission (FWC), a federal body responsible for regulating industrial relations and workplace agreements in Australia. The primary dispute centred around whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues the FWC needed to address were whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, whether it adhered to the provisions of the Fair Work Act, and whether it was genuinely negotiated between the parties. Additionally, the FWC considered the procedural fairness in the negotiation process and whether the agreement contained all required minimum terms and conditions.

In reaching its decision, the FWC examined the evidence presented by both parties, including the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The FWC concluded that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, as it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees and complied with the relevant legislative requirements. The FWC found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and contained all the required minimum terms. The Commission determined that procedural fairness was observed throughout the negotiation process, thereby satisfying the legal standards for approval.

The FWC approved the AWUQenos Botany Operations Enterprise Agreement 2019, thereby resolving the dispute in favour of Qenos Pty Ltd. The decision sets a precedent for similar enterprise agreements and provides clarity on the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.