QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Squires

Case [2023] NSWPIC 367


CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 
CITATION: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Squires [2023] NSWPIC 367
CLAIMANT: David Squires
INSURER: QBE
MEMBER: Hugh Macken
DATE OF DECISION: 25 July 2023
CATCHWORDS:

MOTOR ACCIDENTS - Settlement approval; non-economic loss approved; future economic loss; loss of employer superannuation contributions; fractured right wrist requiring open reduction; pre-existing medical injuries including prior back surgery; Commonwealth employees consequent on Covid lockdown; 11% whole person impairment; Held – proposed settlement figure agreed between the parties; approval given; application of Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 section 7.37; future time off for treatment for injuries caused in motor accident.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

CERTIFICATE

SETTLEMENT APPROVAL

Issued under section 6.23 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017

The amount of the claim for damages is approved in the total amount of $350,000.

STATEMENT OF REASONS

INTRODUCTION

  1. The claimant is a 59 year old man who was injured in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 22 July 2020 when he was a front seat passenger in a car which ran off the road and collided with a tree. The insurer has admitted breach of duty of care on the part of their insured driver with no allegation of contributory negligence.

  2. The figure of the proposed resolution of $350,000 is, by agreement of both parties, compensation for non-economic loss in the sum of $300,000 and future economic loss, by way of a buffer, of $50,000 inclusive of any employer superannuation contributions.

  3. I have no hesitation approving this settlement.

Reasons

  1. The claimant suffered significant injuries in the accident including a fracture of his right wrist which required an open reduction and internal fixation, rib fractures and an injury to his left thigh.

  2. The claimant did have some pre-existing medical issues including prior back surgery. He aggravated his back condition but has advised doctors now that it is much the same as it was prior to the accident.

  3. The claimant confirmed at the assessment conference that at the time of the accident he was in receipt of Commonwealth payments to employees who were not working consequent on the Covid restrictions which were imposed at the time. He returned to his employment, as a car salesman about 12 weeks after the accident and he continues in this employment. He has advised he works 4 days per week and that his earnings vary noting a net salary of about $800 per week and then commissions of about $4,000 per month. The claimant has advised that he does not suffer any impaired earning capacity consequent on the motor vehicle accident.

  4. The material bears out some ongoing problems associated with the motor vehicle accident noting that there was a finding of Dr C. Harrington in his report dated 9 July 2021 of an 11% whole person impairment. In my view compensation of $300,000 for non-economic loss can fairly be described as “at the higher end of the scale”. The buffer of $45,000, plus loss of superannuation benefits of about $5,000, fairly and completely takes into account any loss of earnings consequent on his post-accident disabilities. It may be that he could lose some time off work for treatment. Such a figure of $50,000 for future economic loss more than compensates for any possible loss of earnings which the claimant may suffer in the future.

  5. Finally, it would be remiss not to make the observation that the claimant is a remarkably stoic individual who has dealt with significant injuries with optimism and strength. That he has recovered so quickly from the very significant injuries he suffered have such a small effect on him is a testament to his courage and character.

  6. I have no hesitation in approving the proposed settlement figure and noting all the recitals in the proposed Deed of Release.

Legislation

  1. In making my decision I have considered the following legislation and guidelines:

    ·        Motor Accident Injuries Act2017, Section 6.23 (3)

    ·        Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017, Section 7.37

Details
AGLC
QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Squires [2023] NSWPIC 367
Case
[2023] NSWPIC 367
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Squires involved a dispute over the settlement of damages following a motor accident. The plaintiff, Squires, sought approval for a settlement amount that included compensation for non-economic loss, future economic loss, and loss of employer superannuation contributions. The dispute arose after Squires sustained a fractured right wrist in the accident, which required open reduction, and had pre-existing medical conditions including prior back surgery. The matter was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT).

The legal issues before the tribunal included whether the proposed settlement amount was reasonable and whether it adequately compensated for the various losses claimed. A significant issue was the assessment of future economic loss, particularly in light of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on Squires' employment as a Commonwealth employee. The tribunal also needed to determine if the settlement correctly accounted for the pre-existing conditions and their interplay with the injuries sustained in the accident. Furthermore, the tribunal had to consider the application of the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017, particularly section 7.37, which deals with future time off for treatment of injuries caused by the motor accident.

The tribunal approved the proposed settlement, finding it to be fair and reasonable. The tribunal considered the specific circumstances of Squires, including the 11% whole person impairment rating and the need for future treatment. The tribunal found that the settlement appropriately accounted for non-economic loss, future economic loss, and the loss of employer superannuation contributions. The tribunal noted that the Covid-19 pandemic had affected Squires' employment but concluded that this was adequately reflected in the assessment of future economic loss. The tribunal also considered the pre-existing medical conditions and determined that they were appropriately factored into the overall settlement. The tribunal applied section 7.37 of the Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017 in assessing the future time off for treatment, ensuring that this aspect was fairly represented in the settlement.

The tribunal granted approval for the settlement, providing Squires with the agreed compensation for the injuries sustained in the motor accident. The orders included approval of the settlement amount, which was deemed to be fair and reasonable given the circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.