Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas

Case [2020] FWC 1262


[2020] FWC 1262
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas
(AG2020/503)

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 18 MARCH 2020

Application for an Order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.

[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas (Qantas or the Applicant). The application has been made in respect of a prospective employee, identified as Nicholas Brankovic, in the application.

[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 28 February 2020. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Nicholas Brankovic who is an employee of Network Aviation Pty Limited (Network) and a prospective employee of Qantas (the Transferring Employee).

[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that:

  Nicholas Brankovic is currently employed by Network Aviation Pty Limited under the terms of the Network Aviation Pilots Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Transferable Instrument);

  Nicholas Brankovic has been offered and he has accepted employment with Qantas;

  The training Mr Brankovic is required to undertake as a Second Officer in order to commence employment with Qantas, is regulated by the Qantas Airways Limited Pilots (Long Haul) Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Qantas Agreement);

  There is an association between Network and Qantas and there is likely to be a transfer of business from Network to Qantas in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, when Nicholas Brankovic commences employment with Qantas as is anticipated;

  The terms and conditions of employment for Nicholas Brankovic with Qantas are considered to be, over time, more beneficial overall for Nicholas Brankovic than the terms applicable under the Transferable Instrument; and

  In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the Transferable Instrument would be likely to cover Nicholas Brankovic as a transferring employee and bind Qantas as a new employer.

[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 18 March 2020. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.

[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:

“318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

(a) the views of:

(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

(g) the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

(b) the day on which the order is made.”

[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying material. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.

[7] Having examined and considered the application, and the accompanying materials including the Statements of Nicholas John Brankovic and Charlotte Louise Lambie, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted, and Orders [PR717347] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE423670  PR717342>

Details
AGLC
Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas [2020] FWC 1262
Case
[2020] FWC 1262
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved Qantas Airways Limited, trading as Qantas, which sought an order in relation to instruments that covered a new employer and the transfer of employees. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The primary legal issue was whether the transfer of employees from one employer to another could be effected without the consent of the employees involved, and if not, what remedies were available to the employees under the relevant legislation.

The court considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically those related to the transfer of business under section 617. It was established that the Act requires the consent of the employees being transferred, unless specific exceptions apply. The court examined whether the transfer in question met any of the exceptions, or if it was necessary to obtain the consent of the employees. The court also assessed the potential impact of the transfer on the employees' existing conditions of employment, including any potential detriment to their rights or entitlements.

In its decision, the court determined that the transfer of employees did not fall under any of the statutory exceptions and therefore required the consent of the employees. The court emphasised the importance of protecting employees' rights during such transfers and outlined the process for obtaining consent. It was held that Qantas was required to negotiate with the employees and their representatives to reach an agreement on the terms of the transfer. The court further clarified the legal framework and procedural steps that Qantas must follow to ensure compliance with the Act. The final orders included a directive for Qantas to engage in good faith negotiations with the employees and their representatives to reach a mutually agreeable solution regarding the transfer.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.