[2013] FWCA 5330 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Qantas Airways Limited
(AG2013/1975)
QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (AWU, AMWU, CEPU) BRISBANE BASE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 4
Airline operations | |
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON | SYDNEY, 5 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Qantas Airways Limited (AWU, AMWU, CEPU) Brisbane Base Maintenance Agreement 4.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qantas Airways Limited (AWU, AMWU, CEPU) Brisbane Base Maintenance Agreement 4 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qantas Airways Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1)(a) will operate from 12 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2016.
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE402838 PR539740>
- AGLC
- Qantas Airways Limited [2013] FWCA 5330
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5330
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the terms of the proposed agreement were fair and reasonable, and if they complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The unions argued that the proposed agreement did not adequately protect the rights and conditions of the employees, while Qantas contended that the agreement was necessary to ensure operational efficiency and competitiveness. The court needed to balance the rights of the employees and the interests of the employer, while ensuring that the agreement was in line with the principles of industrial relations law.
The court considered the arguments of both parties and examined the terms of the proposed agreement in detail. It found that while the unions raised valid concerns about certain aspects of the agreement, the overall terms were fair and reasonable. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining a balance between the rights of employees and the interests of employers, and concluded that the proposed agreement achieved this balance. The court approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to address the unions' concerns. The final orders of the court included the approval of the agreement with the specified modifications, ensuring that the rights of the employees were protected while allowing Qantas to maintain its operational efficiency.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.