[2014] FWCA 4690 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Pulse Credit Union Limited
(AG2014/6588)
PULSE CREDIT UNION LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2014
Banking finance and insurance industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 14 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Pulse Credit Union Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Pulse Credit Union Limited (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Pulse Credit Union Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with a non-Union Employee Bargaining Representative and is to cover 19 employees who are employed at a number of credit unions in Victoria.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 3 June 2014, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 24 June 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a ballot, all 19 of the employees agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 26 June 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr D Andrews, Credit Union Officer, identified the Banking Finance and Insurance Award 2010 [MA000019] as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Andrewssaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial, than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. The Agreement provides for job share arrangements, enhanced redundancy entitlements and an option to take two days in lieu rather than overtime where work is performed on a public holiday. Rates of pay are to be increased by 2.5% or in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review Decisions, whichever is the higher, on 1 July each year during the Agreement’s nominal term. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 7 and 8 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 9 provides for conciliation, mediation and consent arbitration by the Commission.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 11 July 2014, Mr D Andrews appeared for the applicant and Ms J O’Brien appeared in her capacity as an Employee Bargaining Representative. Mr Andrews outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that the Agreement was largely in similar terms to another enterprise agreement which also covers the applicant and which was approved by the Commission in 2011.
[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Pulse Credit Union Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 18 July 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409063 PR553083>
- AGLC
- Pulse Credit Union Limited [2014] FWCA 4690
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4690
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission was required to determine whether the provisions of the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether the agreement facilitated a productive workplace relationship and whether it was free from coercive conduct. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement's provisions on shift and leave entitlements were fair and reasonable.
The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions which were not consistent with the Fair Work Act, particularly those that allowed for compulsory shift rotations and restricted leave entitlements. The Commission was concerned that these provisions could lead to employee dissatisfaction and potentially affect workplace relations negatively. Given these findings, the Commission approved the agreement with modifications to ensure that the shift and leave provisions complied with the requirements of the Act. The modifications ensured that employees had more flexibility and predictability in their work schedules and leave arrangements.
The Commission ordered that the agreement be approved with the specified modifications to the shift and leave provisions. The approved agreement would then be registered with the Fair Work Commission, providing a legally binding framework for the employment relationship between Pulse Credit Union Limited and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.