Public Service Association And Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union Of New South Wales T/A Public Service Association Of New South Wales

Case [2024] FWCA 2095


[2024] FWCA 2095

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Public Service Association And Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union Of New South Wales T/A Public Service Association Of New South Wales

(AG2024/1667)

PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NSW STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Clerical industry

COMMISSIONER TRAN

MELBOURNE, 6 JUNE 2024

Application for approval of the Public Service Association of NSW Staff Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Public Service Association And Professional Officers’ Association Amalgamated Union Of New South Wales T/A Public Service Association Of New South Wales has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Public Service Association of NSW Staff Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  1. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I note that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards:

-     Clause 37.9 may be inconsistent with s 97 of the Act regarding taking paid personal/carer’s leave;

-     Clause 37.13 as it contains more stringent requirements than s 107(3) of the Act regarding notice and evidence;

-     Clause 52.5 may operate to withhold NES payments and appears to be in breach of s 324 and unenforceable under s 326; and

-     Clause 54.1(c) provides less beneficial redundancy pay for employees who have completed 1 but less than 2 years of service and who would be otherwise be entitled to 4 weeks’ pay under s 119(2).

  1. As the Agreement now contains a National Employment Standards precedence clause provided as part of the undertakings, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Industrial Staff Union, the United Workers’ Union and the Australian Municipal Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have each given notice under s 183 of the Act that each organisation wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers each organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2024.

  1. In accordance with Clause 4.1, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2026.

Variation

  1. In the process of applying for the approval of this Agreement, the Commission’s Agreements Team identified that references to clause numbers in the Agreement’s consultation clause may have been in error.

  1. Section 218A of the Act allows the Commission to correct or amend obvious errors, defects or irregularities. It is a discretionary power, and the Commission first be satisfied that the identified errors or amendments sought are obvious errors, defects or irregularities.

  1. I determined to vary the Agreement on my own initiative, following the identification of the errors, and making enquiries with the Applicant. The Applicant provided an amended copy of the Agreement, with only the amendments identified above. I am satisfied that the amendments should be made and that it is appropriate to do so in accordance with s 218A. The variation will operate from the date the Agreement commences.

  1. The Agreement attached to this Decision is the Agreement as varied and will operate from 13 June 2024.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE524933 PR775746>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Public Service Association And Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union Of New South Wales T/A Public Service Association Of New South Wales [2024] FWCA 2095
Case
[2024] FWCA 2095
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Public Service Association of New South Wales, on behalf of its members, applied for the approval of the Public Service Association of NSW Staff Enterprise Agreement 2024. The dispute centred on whether the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed agreement were fair and reasonable for the employees involved. The application was brought under the Fair Work Act 2009, which mandates that enterprise agreements must meet specific criteria before being approved.

The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement contained terms that were procedurally and substantively fair. Procedural fairness required scrutiny of the processes undertaken by the union to negotiate the agreement, ensuring that it complied with the necessary legal standards. Substantive fairness involved evaluating the terms of the agreement itself to ensure they were equitable and did not unfairly disadvantage any party. The Commission also considered whether the agreement complied with the 'better off overall test', which ensures that employees are not worse off financially by being under the new agreement than they would be under the previous award or agreement.

The Commission found that the negotiation process was procedurally sound, as the union had followed the appropriate steps in consulting with its members and bargaining with the employer. In terms of substantive fairness, the Commission assessed the various terms and conditions of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting the criteria for approval under the Act. The agreement was found to comply with the 'better off overall test', ensuring that employees would not be worse off financially. Therefore, the Commission approved the application and the agreement was registered, effective from the specified date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.