PTP Automed Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 5400


[2014] FWCA 5400
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

PTP Automed Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1657)

PTP AUTOMED PTY LTD - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2018

Fast food industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

PERTH, 8 AUGUST 2014

Application for approval of the PTP Automed Pty Ltd - Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 - undertakings provided - error in Agreement corrected.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the PTP Automed Pty Ltd - Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] On 24 July 2014, the Commission wrote to the Applicant via its representatives in relation to a number of concerns it had with the Agreement. In particular, the concerns related to the rates of pay, casual employees, meal breaks, weekend and public holiday penalties. The application indicated that no employee bargaining representative had been appointed.

[3] Correspondence was received from the Applicant on 31 July 2014.

Correction of error

[4] In its correspondence to the Commission the Applicant advised that it sought to amend the existing clause 3.5 - Superannuation, of the Agreement. In particular, the Applicant seeks to increase the level of superannuation contribution to 9.5% from the 9.25% stated in the Agreement.

[5] Pursuant to s.586(a) of the Act, the Commission may allow for a correction or amendment of any application, or other document relating to a matter before the Commission, on any terms it considers appropriate. On the request made by the Applicant with respect to the increase of the level of the superannuation contribution, the amount will be amended to 9.5%.

Undertakings

Casual employees

[6] The Commission notes that clause 4.1.2 – Hours of work – Part-time Employees, in particular, sub clause 4.1.2(b) of the Agreement provides that the minimum daily engagement of a part-time employee is a minimum of two hours per shift. The Fast Food Industry Award 2010 (the Award), being the relevant modern award for the purpose of the better off overall test at clause 12.2 provides that the minimum daily engagement of a part-time employee is three hours.

[7] The Applicant has provided an undertaking with respect to sub clause 4.1.2(b) of the Agreement that a part-time employee will be provided a minimum three hours per shift and a maximum of ten hours per shift.

[8] Further, the Commission notes that clause 4.1.3 - Hours of work - Casual Employees, provides that a casual employee will be engaged on a minimum two hour shift. The Award at sub clause 13.4 provides that the minimum daily engagement of a casual is three hours.

[9] The Applicant has provided an undertaking with respect to sub clause 4.1.3 of the Agreement that a casual employee will be provided a minimum three hours per shift and a maximum of ten hours per shift.

Meal and rest breaks

[10] The Commission notes that clause 4.4 – Breaks, of the Agreement provides that all employees are entitled to an unpaid meal break of 30 minutes if they work more than 6 consecutive hours in a shift. The Award at clause 27.1 provides for further meal and rest breaks where hours of work are beyond 5 hours.

[11] The Applicant has provided an undertaking with respect to clause 4.4.1 of the Agreement that it will apply the meal and rest breaks as they are provided for at sub clause 27.1(a) of the Award.

Rates of pay and penalties

[12] The Commission notes that the Agreement does not provide for weekend and public holiday penalties as employees are compensated for these in the hourly rate of pay being higher than the Award. The Commission requested the Applicant to provide a number of indicative rosters and calculations to demonstrate that employees are better off overall under the Agreement despite the Agreement not providing for these penalties.

[13] The Applicant provided a number of indicative rosters and calculations. Upon review of the Commission’s concerns the Applicant has advised that it has identified that employee’s aged 16, 17 and 20 years old may not be better off overall. The Applicant has provided an undertaking to increase the rates of pay with respect to employees aged 16, 17 and 20 years old by 60 cents per hour.

[14] Upon review of the correspondence and undertakings I am satisfied the Agreement meets the better off overall test.

[15] These undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A.

[16] The undertakings are not so substantial that if asked to vote again the employees who voted would not approve the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the undertakings do not result in substantial change to the Agreement as per s.190(3)(b) of the Act.

[17] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[18] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) the Agreement will operate from 15 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2018.

[19] A copy of this decision is to be made available to and brought to the attention of all employees.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE409523  PR554065>

Details
AGLC
PTP Automed Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5400
Case
[2014] FWCA 5400
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by PTP Automed Pty Ltd to have the PTP Automed Pty Ltd - Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 approved. The agreement had been negotiated between the employer and the union, and it was sought to be approved under the Fair Work Act 2009. The union had provided undertakings to ensure compliance with the agreement, but an error in the document was identified which required correction.

The primary legal issue the Commission had to address was whether the error in the agreement, which had been identified and proposed to be corrected, would result in the agreement not being approved. The Commission had to consider the nature of the error, the extent to which it affected the agreement, and the undertakings provided by the union to correct the error and ensure compliance.

The Commission found that the error in the agreement did not fundamentally impair the agreement or the process by which it was negotiated. The union's undertakings were sufficient to ensure compliance with the agreement as corrected. The error was not such that it would undermine the integrity of the bargaining process or the agreement itself. Accordingly, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement with the corrected error and noted the undertakings provided by the union.

The Fair Work Commission approved the PTP Automed Pty Ltd - Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 as corrected, and noted the undertakings provided by the union to ensure compliance with the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.