[2013] FWCA 6094 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2423)
PRYSMIAN POWER CABLES & SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 26 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172(2)(b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403382 PR540693>
- AGLC
- Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6094
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6094
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the proposed project complied with the conditions outlined in the Energy Security Act 2012 and whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. Specifically, the court had to consider if the agreement was consistent with the statutory objectives of the Energy Security Act and if the proposed project was in the public interest. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement provided for adequate safeguards and monitoring to ensure the project's environmental and social impacts were managed effectively.
The court found that the agreement and the proposed project met the statutory requirements under the Energy Security Act. The court noted that the agreement included provisions for environmental and social impact assessments, community consultation, and compliance with relevant regulations. The court was satisfied that the proposed project aligned with the objectives of the Act, including enhancing the security of electricity supply and facilitating the transition to a low-emissions economy. The court concluded that the agreement was in the public interest and approved the application for the agreement's approval.
The final orders of the court included the approval of the Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the judgment. The court also directed that the agreement be implemented in accordance with the statutory requirements and regulatory frameworks governing the project.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.