| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | |
| WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | WG 41 of 1998 |
BETWEEN: | PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES (AUSTRALIA) LTD |
AND: BETWEEN: AND: | JACARANDA SECURITIES LTD WG 42 of 1998 PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES (AUSTRALIA) LTD CARIS LTD |
JUDGE: | TAMBERLIN J |
DATE: | 27 NOVEMBER 1998 |
PLACE: | PERTH |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Ex-Tempore Judgment
In the matter of Prudential‑Bache Securities (Australia) Ltd v Caris Ltd WAG 42 of 1998, I am satisfied, on the material which has been placed before me, that the respondent is liable in respect of the amount claimed. Accordingly, I make orders in accordance with the amended notice of motion for judgment in paragraph 1. I order that judgment be entered against the respondent pursuant to O 20 of the Federal Court Rules in the amount of $4,868,815.10 together with interest on the outstanding amount at the rate of 10.1 per cent per annum up to and including today to be calculated in accordance with the loan agreement. I order that the respondent pay the costs of the applicant in this matter.
In relation to the other matter which is before me; namely, Prudential-Bache Securities (Australia) Ltd v Jacaranda Securities Ltd WAG 41 of 1998, I am also satisfied that the material establishes that the respondent is liable in respect of the amount claimed and evidenced in the affidavits. Accordingly, I make order 1 in accordance with the first paragraph of the amended notice of motion for judgment and I order that judgment be entered against the respondent, Jacaranda Securities Pty Ltd in the amount of $690,316.05 together with interest thereon at the rate of 8.1 per cent per annum in accordance with the loan agreement. I order that the respondent should pay the applicant's costs in this matter.
I reserve liberty to apply on two days notice in relation to any matter that might arise in relation to the calculation of the final amount of the judgment in each case.
| I certify that this and the preceding one (1) pages are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin |
Associate:
Dated: 27 November 1998
| Solicitor for the Applicant: | Blake Dawson Waldron |
| Date of Hearing: | 27 November 1998 |
| Date of Judgment: | 27 November 1998 |
- AGLC
- Prudential-Bache Securities (Australia) Ltd v Jacaranda Securities Ltd Prudential-Bache Securities (Australia) Ltd v Caris Ltd [1998] FCA 1667
- Case
- [1998] FCA 1667
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue revolved around the interpretation of the loan agreements and whether the respondents had any valid defences or counter-claims that could diminish or eliminate their liability. The Court examined the terms of the loan agreements, the nature of the transactions, and the evidence provided by both parties to ascertain the amounts owed by the respondents to the applicant. The Court found that the material presented established the respondents' liability for the amounts claimed, with specific reference to the interest rates and the calculation methods outlined in the loan agreements.
Justice Tamberlin delivered a detailed judgment, finding that the respondents were indeed liable for the amounts claimed by the applicant. The Court ordered that judgment be entered against the respondents for the specified amounts, including interest, and also directed that the respondents pay the applicant's costs. The Court reserved the right to address any issues that might arise concerning the calculation of the final amounts owed.
In summary, the Court held that the respondents were liable for the sums claimed by the applicant under the loan agreements and ordered judgment to be entered accordingly. The Court also directed that the respondents pay the applicant's costs in both matters. The decision was rendered on the same day as the hearing, reflecting the Court's efficiency in resolving the disputes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.