PROUST & CROCE
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 381
•18 May 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
PROUST & CROCE [2015] FamCA 381
[2015] FamCA 381
18 May 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of PROUST & CROCE, Berman J of the Family Court of Australia made orders concerning parenting arrangements for the children B and C. The proceedings involved an application by the wife for leave to proceed on an undefended basis, which was granted. The husband's Second Amended Response to Initiating Application was dismissed.
The court was required to determine the parenting orders for the children, including where they would live, parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of the husband's time with them. Additionally, the court considered issues relating to communication between the husband and children, the possession of the children's passports, and the renewal of one child's passport. The discharge of an Independent Children's Lawyer and the wife's application for costs were also addressed.
Berman J ordered that the children B and C live with the wife, and that the wife have sole parental responsibility for B. The husband was to spend no time with the children unless they wished, and any such time was to be facilitated by the wife and in accordance with the children's wishes. The husband was permitted to send a limited number of emails to the children annually, subject to the wife's vetting. The wife was also ordered to provide the husband with copies of school reports and photographs, and to retain the children's passports, with authority to renew B's passport without the husband's consent. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged. Further consideration of the wife's costs application was adjourned.
The court was required to determine the parenting orders for the children, including where they would live, parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of the husband's time with them. Additionally, the court considered issues relating to communication between the husband and children, the possession of the children's passports, and the renewal of one child's passport. The discharge of an Independent Children's Lawyer and the wife's application for costs were also addressed.
Berman J ordered that the children B and C live with the wife, and that the wife have sole parental responsibility for B. The husband was to spend no time with the children unless they wished, and any such time was to be facilitated by the wife and in accordance with the children's wishes. The husband was permitted to send a limited number of emails to the children annually, subject to the wife's vetting. The wife was also ordered to provide the husband with copies of school reports and photographs, and to retain the children's passports, with authority to renew B's passport without the husband's consent. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged. Further consideration of the wife's costs application was adjourned.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
PROUST & CROCE [2015] FamCA 381
Cases Citing This Decision
0