[2016] FWCA 1264
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 | |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement | |
| Protech Group (Aust) Pty Ltd | |
| (AG2016/106) | |
| PROTECH ON-HIRE EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT 2016 | |
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 29 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Protech On-Hire Employee Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Protech On-Hire Employee Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made
pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Protech Group
(Aust) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have
been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however,
taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of
employees was fairly chosen.
[2016] FWCA 1264
[4] The Agreement was approved on 29 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 7 March 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 February 2020.
| COMMISSIONER |
| Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer |
| <Price code G, AE418002 PR577457> |
[2016] FWCA 1264
ANNEXURE A
[2016] FWCA 1264
- AGLC
- Protech Group (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1264
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1264
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the criteria outlined in Sections 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act, and if the selection of employees covered by the agreement was fair. The applicant had to demonstrate that the agreement would not cause financial detriment to employees and that it did not substantially change after the application was submitted. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement was fairly representative of the employee group it covered, even if it did not encompass all employees of the employer.
The Commission found that the applicant had provided written undertakings that satisfied the conditions of Sections 186, 187, 188, and 190, as applicable. These undertakings assured that no financial harm would come to the employees and that the agreement would remain unchanged post-application. Moreover, the Commission was satisfied that the group of employees selected for the agreement was fairly chosen, taking into account the relevant factors in Sections 186(3) and 186(3A). Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the agreement was approved to operate from 7 March 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 29 February 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.