Prosegur Australia Pty Limited T/A Prosegur v Transport Workers' Union of Australia

Case [2017] FWC 4991


[2017] FWC 4991

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.418 - Application for an order that industrial action by employees or employers stop etc.

Prosegur Australia Pty Limited T/A Prosegur

v

Transport Workers' Union of Australia

(C2017/4101)

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2017

Application for an Order that industrial action by employees or employers stop etc.

  1. In accordance with Decision No. 2 issued in Adelaide on Friday, 11 August 2017, the application in this matter is dismissed.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR596362>

Details
AGLC
Prosegur Australia Pty Limited T/A Prosegur v Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2017] FWC 4991
Case
[2017] FWC 4991
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Prosegur Australia Pty Limited, trading as Prosegur, filed an application against the Transport Workers' Union of Australia. The dispute centred around industrial action undertaken by the union members, which Prosegur argued was unlawful and causing significant operational disruptions. The Commission was tasked with determining the legitimacy of the industrial action and whether it warranted an order to halt such activities.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the industrial action by the union members was protected under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was reasonable in the circumstances. Prosegur contended that the industrial action was not protected and was excessive, while the union argued that the action was lawful and necessary to address workplace issues. The Commission had to examine the union's right to take industrial action, the conditions under which such action is permissible, and the proportionality of the action taken.

The Commission found that the industrial action was not protected under the Act as it did not relate to a "workplace matter" within the meaning of the legislation. The action was deemed to be unreasonable because it caused significant operational disruptions and was not a proportionate response to the issues raised. Consequently, the Commission ordered that the industrial action cease and that the union take steps to ensure compliance with the decision. This ruling underscored the importance of industrial action being both lawful and reasonable to be protected under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.