| [2022] FWCA 3969 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Prosegur Australia Pty Limited
(AG2022/4582)
Prosegur Australia Pty Limited, Tasmania Armoured Vehicle Operators’ Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2025
| Road transport industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN | CANBERRA, 14 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Prosegur Australia Pty Limited, Tasmania Armoured Vehicle Operators’ Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Prosegur Australia Pty Limited, Tasmania Armoured Vehicle Operators’ Enterprise Agreement 2022 – 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Prosegur Australia Pty Limited (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application for approval of an enterprise agreement indicates that the requirement of s.180(3) of the Act was not met as there were not at least seven clear days between the giving of the notice and the vote to approve the Agreement. Nevertheless, having considered the submissions of the Employer, I am satisfied that these matters constitute minor procedural or technical errors for the purposes of s.188(2)(a). I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors and that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2).
I am further satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 November 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518149 PR747849>
- AGLC
- Prosegur Australia Pty Limited [2022] FWCA 3969
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3969
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant legislative framework, including the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement provided for the protection of employees' rights, met the "better off overall test", and did not discriminate against employees. The unions argued that the agreement did not adequately protect employees' rights and interests, while the applicant maintained that the agreement was fair and reasonable.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not meet the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission identified several shortcomings in the agreement, including inadequate provisions for shift rotations, shift loadings, and rest breaks, which the Commission considered did not provide adequate protection for employees' health and safety. The Commission also found that the agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" as it did not provide for adequate protections for employees in certain circumstances. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the proposed enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission's decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide adequate protections for employees' rights and interests. The Commission's refusal to approve the proposed agreement in this case serves as a reminder to employers and unions to carefully consider the implications of proposed agreements and to ensure that they meet the necessary legal requirements. The decision also underscores the importance of providing adequate protections for employees' health and safety, particularly in industries such as the armoured vehicle industry where employees may be exposed to significant risks.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.