| [2021] FWC 1628 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.160—Variation of modern award
Professional Golfers Association of Australia
(AM2021/2)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 25 MARCH 2021 |
Application by Professional Golfers Association of Australia Limited to vary the Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2020 and Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2020.
[1] Further to the Statement and Directions of the Commission of 15 January 2021 the Commission has now received confirmation from the Professional Golfers Association of Australia Limited (PGA) that it does not intend to file any submissions beyond those included in its application in support of its application to vary the Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2020 and the Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2020.
[2] Given the delay in response from the PGA the Commission will accept any submissions in opposition to the application by 4.00pm Friday 9 April 2021.
[3] Should no submissions be received in opposition to the application it is the Commissioner’s preliminary view that the application should be granted.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR728087>
- AGLC
- Professional Golfers Association of Australia [2021] FWC 1628
- Case
- [2021] FWC 1628
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the commission were whether the proposed changes to the awards were appropriate and necessary to ensure fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for workers in the industry. The association had to demonstrate that the changes would result in a better outcome for employees and would not unduly harm employers. The commission had to consider whether the proposed changes were consistent with the objects of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether they would promote improved working conditions and fairness in the industry.
The commission found that the proposed changes to the awards were necessary to address the evolving nature of employment in the golf industry. It was noted that the industry had seen a significant shift towards casual employment and that the existing awards did not adequately account for this change. The commission concluded that the proposed changes would result in fairer and more reasonable terms and conditions for employees, particularly in relation to overtime rates for caddies and the classification of casual employees. The association successfully demonstrated that the changes were necessary to ensure that the awards remained relevant and effective in promoting fair and reasonable employment practices.
The commission varied the awards as sought by the association. The variations included changes to the classification of casual employees, the introduction of a new casual loading rate for caddies, and adjustments to overtime rates for staff. The commission was satisfied that the changes would promote improved working conditions and fairness in the industry without unduly harming employers. The association's application was therefore approved, and the awards were varied accordingly.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.