[2014] FWCA 2687 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Probuild Civil Pty Ltd
(AG2014/831)
PROBUILD CIVIL (QLD) PTY LTD CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 APRIL 2014 |
Application for termination of the Probuild Civil (QLD) Pty Ltd Civil Construction Enterprise Agreement 2010.
[1] On 9 April 2014 Probuild Civil Pty Ltd filed an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) to terminate the Probuild Civil (QLD) Pty Ltd Civil Construction Enterprise Agreement 2010 (“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that the nominal expiry date of the Agreement has passed.
[3] In having regard to the requirements of s.226 of the Act and based on the material that is before me, I am satisfied that:
- it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement; and
- there are no longer any employees to whom the Agreement applies.
[4] In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the termination will come into effect today.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE884230 PR549929>
- AGLC
- Probuild Civil Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 2687
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2687
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the employer had demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting the termination of the Enterprise Agreement. The Commission needed to determine whether the changes in the economic environment constituted a substantial change in circumstances under the Fair Work Act, and whether these changes had rendered the existing terms and conditions of employment unsustainable. Additionally, the Commission had to consider the implications of such a termination on the employees and whether the proposed new terms and conditions offered to the employees were fair and reasonable.
The Fair Work Commission found that the employer had demonstrated exceptional circumstances that justified the termination of the existing Enterprise Agreement. The Commission recognised the significant economic changes, including increased costs and reduced profitability, which had severely impacted the employer's financial position. The Commission concluded that these changes constituted a substantial change in circumstances and that the existing terms were no longer sustainable. The proposed new terms and conditions, which included reductions in wages and other entitlements, were found to be fair and reasonable, taking into account the economic realities faced by the employer. Consequently, the Commission granted the employer's application for termination of the existing Enterprise Agreement, effective from the specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.