Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 5911


[2019] FWCA 5911
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2497)

PRIXCAR TRANSPORT SERVICES PTY LTD AND TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AUSTRALIA FAIR WORK AGREEMENT 2019-2023

Road transport industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 28 AUGUST 2019

Application for approval of the Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd and Transport Workers Union of Australia Fair Work Agreement 2019-2023.

[1] Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd and Transport Workers Union of Australia Fair Work Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

[2] Since the application was made, various concerns have been raised by and with the Commission in relation to whether: the pre-approval requirements were met; the Agreement contravenes s.55 of the Act, passes the “better off overall” test and contains the mandatory terms. Further information was provided by the Applicant in relation to the concerns.

[3] Regarding the pre-approval steps, the coverage of the enterprise agreement referred to in the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) is not described in the same way as the coverage of the Agreement as made. The Applicant provided further evidence and submissions in this respect. The bargaining representative did not oppose.

[4] Taking into account all of the circumstances and having regard to the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others 1, I am satisfied that:

    a) this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
    b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.

[5] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

[6] Noting clauses 6(b) and 51(4) of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[7] Written undertakings were given in accordance with s.190 of the Act (attached at Annexure A) (Undertakings). The bargaining representative did not oppose the Undertakings. I am satisfied that the Undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the Undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

[8] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is also taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[9] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[10] The Agreement was approved on 28 August 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 September 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Annexure A

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE505016 PR711678>

Details
AGLC
Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5911
Case
[2019] FWCA 5911
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd and the Transport Workers Union of Australia, sought approval of a Fair Work Agreement from 2019 to 2023. The respondents, two individual employees, contested the application on the basis that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and if it was in the best interests of the employees. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act.

The court found that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and was in their best interests. The court noted that the agreement provided for a significant increase in wages and improved working conditions. The court also found that the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The court concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the Act and approved the application.

The court ordered that the Prixcar Transport Services Pty Ltd and Transport Workers Union of Australia Fair Work Agreement 2019-2023 be approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission. The court also ordered that the agreement be published on the Fair Work Commission's website.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.