PRESTON & PRESTON
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 28
•1 February 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
PRESTON & PRESTON [2013] FamCA 28
[2013] FamCA 28
1 February 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Preston & Preston*, the Family Court of Australia considered a property settlement dispute between a husband and wife. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the need for property settlement, is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before Cronin J was the appropriate division of the parties' property under section 79 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This required the court to determine the quantum of financial resources to be transferred from the husband to the wife as a partial settlement.
Cronin J ordered that the husband pay the wife the sum of $120,000. This payment was designated as a partial settlement of property. All interim applications made by the parties were otherwise dismissed.
The central legal issue before Cronin J was the appropriate division of the parties' property under section 79 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This required the court to determine the quantum of financial resources to be transferred from the husband to the wife as a partial settlement.
Cronin J ordered that the husband pay the wife the sum of $120,000. This payment was designated as a partial settlement of property. All interim applications made by the parties were otherwise dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
PRESTON & PRESTON [2013] FamCA 28
Most Recent Citation
Cheyne and Masters and Anor (SSAT Appeal) [2014] FCCA 856
Cases Citing This Decision
2
LISTER & SEWELL
[2016] FCCA 2215
Cheyne and Masters and Anor (SSAT Appeal)
[2014] FCCA 856