PRESCOTT & SANDERSON

This matter came before Bennett J concerning orders relating to the children D and E. The dispute involved the parents' obligations regarding the children's therapeutic treatment and time spent with each parent. The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for D's psychological consultations and the parents' conduct in relation to these consultations, as well as to vary existing orders concerning E's time with the father.

The court was tasked with determining the legal issues surrounding the implementation of therapeutic interventions for D, including the roles of various professionals such as Ms F (psychologist) and Professor S. It also needed to address the parents' interactions with these professionals and with D during her treatment. Furthermore, the court had to consider adjustments to E's time with her father, taking into account her medical conditions and the potential for anxiety.

Bennett J's reasoning focused on establishing a structured and supportive environment for D's therapeutic process, emphasising collaboration between professionals and minimising parental interference. The court discharged a previous order concerning D and imposed new obligations on both parents to facilitate her appointments with Ms F and continued consultation with Professor S. Specific directions were given to Ms F regarding her therapeutic approach and reporting, and to the Independent Children's Lawyer regarding the provision of relevant reports. The court also imposed restraints on the parents to prevent them from contacting or discussing D's therapy with Ms F, except through Professor S, and prohibited them from being present during D's sessions. For E, the court varied existing orders to adjust her time with the father, making it conditional on a consultation with Dr L to discuss strategies for managing her anxiety during these periods. The court also addressed the financial responsibilities for D's treatment and noted the upcoming final hearing.