Prentice and Maheris

This matter came before Young J concerning applications made by both the husband and the wife. The dispute involved interim and interlocutory financial relief, as well as the sale of properties located in K and P.

The court was required to determine several issues, including the adjournment of applications for interim financial relief, the filing of further affidavit material, the presentation of concise statements of sought orders and property sale strategies, the management of rental income from a property at B Street, restrictions on dealings with a property at K Road, and the disclosure of source documents by the husband to the wife's solicitors. The court also considered the costs of the hearing and the attendance of counsel.

Young J ordered that the applications for interim financial relief be adjourned to a later date. The court imposed a moratorium on the filing of further affidavit material without leave and directed both parties to provide concise statements of their desired orders and property sale strategies. Specific directions were given regarding the payment of rental income from the B Street property to the Commonwealth Bank of Australia for loan repayments, and restrictions were placed on any dealings with the K Road property that would prevent vacant possession or sale. The husband was also ordered to provide certain source documents to the wife's solicitors. Costs were reserved for determination at the adjourned hearing.