| [2016] FWCA 166 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Premiair Automation and Controls Pty Ltd
(AG2015/7652)
PREMIAIR AUTOMATION & CONTROLS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT - 2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 11 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Premiair Automation & Controls Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Premiair Automation & Controls Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Premiair Automation and Controls Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Agreement was approved on and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 18 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417394 PR575970>
- AGLC
- Premiair Automation and Controls Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 166
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 166
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees, and whether it was made in good faith. Additionally, the court needed to assess if the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions, and if the process for obtaining employee approval was fair and transparent. The primary focus was on whether the employer had adequately consulted with the employees and whether the agreement was fairly presented to them.
The Fair Work Commission held that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and made in good faith, as evidenced by the employer's efforts to consult with the employees and the thorough documentation provided. The court found that all the mandated minimum terms and conditions were included in the agreement. Furthermore, the process for obtaining employee approval was deemed fair, as it involved an independent body overseeing the voting process and ensuring that employees were properly informed about the implications of the agreement. Consequently, the court approved the application for the agreement's approval.
The Fair Work Commission's decision to approve the application signifies a recognition of the employer's efforts to negotiate and consult with employees in good faith. This approval underscores the importance of following the mandated procedures for enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act, ensuring that both employers and employees are treated fairly throughout the negotiation and approval process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.