[2013] FWCA 6508 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Precision Catering & Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Precision Mining Camps and Services
(AG2013/2540)
PRECISION MINING CAMPS AND SERVICES ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 5 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Precision Mining Camps and Services Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Precision Mining Camps and Services Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172 (2) (b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403697 PR541194>
- AGLC
- Precision Catering & Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Precision Mining Camps and Services [2013] FWCA 6508
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6508
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a single interest employer agreement and if it was in the best interests of the employees. The applicant argued that the agreement was a single interest employer agreement, which it was necessary to prove to gain approval. The applicant also needed to demonstrate that the agreement was in the employees' best interests.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the agreement was a single interest employer agreement and was in the best interests of the employees. The agreement was necessary to address the unique nature of the mining camp and the specific needs of the workforce. The agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, including provisions for shift patterns, leave entitlements, and other working conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and was beneficial to the employees. The Commission approved the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.