PPFQ and National Disability Insurance Agency

Case

[2019] AATA 1092

31 May 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
PPFQ and National Disability Insurance Agency [2019] AATA 1092 [2019] AATA 1092 31 May 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application by PPFQ, who suffers from moderate to severe hearing loss, tinnitus, and hyperacusis, for funding for high-level technology hearing aids. The dispute before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was whether the requested hearing aids constituted reasonable and necessary supports under section 34(1) of the *National Disability Insurance Act 2013* (Cth).

The Tribunal was required to determine whether the proposed supports met the criteria of being reasonable and necessary. This involved considering whether adequate investigation had been undertaken into other sources of funding, whether the supports represented value for money by having reasonable costs relative to the benefits and alternative support costs, and whether the supports were the minimum necessary.

The Tribunal found that the GN Resound LiNX 3D 9 hearing aids, which PPFQ found most comfortable, satisfied the requirements of section 34(1)(c) of the Act and were therefore reasonable and necessary supports. The parties subsequently agreed on the terms of the decision.

The Tribunal set aside the internal review decision of 13 April 2018 and substituted a decision to include a pair of GN Resound LiNX 3D 9 hearing aids as a reasonable and necessary support to be funded under the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0