POYZER & TRITTON

In the Family Court of Australia, Dawe J considered an application by the husband, Mr. Poyzer, and a response from the wife, Ms. Tritton. The husband sought to vary existing orders and obtain an ongoing injunction, both pending the delivery of judgment in the primary proceedings.

The court was required to determine whether there was sufficient new evidence to warrant varying the existing orders or granting a further injunction. Additionally, the court considered whether it was appropriate to exercise its discretion to hear the issue of child support after the trial had concluded.

Dawe J found that no sufficient new evidence had been presented to support the husband's applications for variation of orders or for an injunction. Consequently, the court determined it was inappropriate to exercise its discretion to hear the child support issue at that late stage. The applications were therefore dismissed.

The husband's Application in a Case filed on 19 January 2010 was dismissed, and the matter was to proceed with judgment reserved.