Poyzer and Tritton
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 734
•4 August 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Poyzer and Tritton [2009] FamCA 734
[2009] FamCA 734
4 August 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Poyzer and Tritton*, Dawe J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered an application to extend time for compliance with a previous court order. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, beyond the need for an extension of time, is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of time for both parties to comply with paragraph 1 of an order made on 5 May 2009.
Dawe J reasoned that an extension of time was appropriate, ordering that the compliance deadline be extended for both parties until 21 August 2009. The specific grounds for this decision or the legal principles applied in reaching it are not elaborated upon in the provided extract.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant an extension of time for both parties to comply with paragraph 1 of an order made on 5 May 2009.
Dawe J reasoned that an extension of time was appropriate, ordering that the compliance deadline be extended for both parties until 21 August 2009. The specific grounds for this decision or the legal principles applied in reaching it are not elaborated upon in the provided extract.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Poyzer and Tritton [2009] FamCA 734
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0