DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd
(AG2020/1107)

POWERLINES PLUS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Electrical power industry
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC	MELBOURNE, 26 MAY 2020

Application for approval of Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] I note that clause 2.4 of the Agreement states that it will commence operation on the seventh day after the day it is approved and shall remain in force for a period of 4 years which differs from the requirements of s.54(1) of the Act.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 26 May 2020 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement, being 2 June 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 May 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd sought approval for the Enterprise Agreement 2020 from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement was a collective bargaining arrangement between the employer and the employees, which sought to regulate terms and conditions of employment. The application for approval was contested by various unions who argued that certain provisions of the agreement were not fair and reasonable.

The central legal issues that the court needed to address were whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was procedurally fair and reasonable. The court had to consider the provisions of the agreement in the context of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement that the agreement be fair and reasonable, and whether it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The court also had to assess the fairness of the agreement, including whether it provided for the protection of employees' interests and whether it provided for an appropriate balance between the rights and obligations of the employer and the employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was procedurally fair and had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The court held that the agreement was fair and reasonable, as it provided for appropriate protections for employees and an appropriate balance between the rights and obligations of the employer and the employees. The court approved the Enterprise Agreement 2020, subject to certain modifications to address the concerns raised by the unions. The modifications related to the provisions concerning the calculation of penalty rates and the process for resolving disputes. The court held that these modifications were necessary to ensure that the agreement was fair and reasonable and provided for the protection of employees' interests.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2020, subject to the modifications made by the court. The court held that the modifications were necessary to ensure that the agreement was fair and reasonable and provided for the protection of employees' interests. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provided for appropriate protections for employees and an appropriate balance between the rights and obligations of the employer and the employees. The court also highlighted the importance of genuine negotiation between the parties in the collective bargaining process.

Powerlines Plus Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established