| [2022] FWCA 1697 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd T/A Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd
(AG2022/1419)
Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd CFMEU and AMWU Latrobe Valley Power Station Agreement 2022
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd CFMEU and AMWU Latrobe Valley Power Station Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd CFMEU and AMWU Latrobe Valley Power Station Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.182(4) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd T/A Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement.
The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 13 May 2022.
The agreement is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.
In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note that the Agreement was made with the CFMMEU and the AMWU and that the Agreement covers these organisations.
On 13 May 2022, my Chambers sent correspondence to the parties seeking to address concerns with certain aspects of the Agreement and invited the parties to address these matters. The concerns were as follows:
· The parties were notified that pursuant to clause 54(1) of the Act, the Agreement would commence 7 days following approval by the Fair Work Commission instead of the commence date contained at clause 5 of the Agreement.
· Clause 8 relating to termination and clauses 6.1.6 and 21 relating to public holidays could be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES).
The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 19 May 2022. The undertaking deals with the following topic:
· The employer submitted a NES precedence undertaking.
A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.
The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term that meets the requirements of s.205 of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I am satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 31 January 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516047 PR741885>
- AGLC
- Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd T/A Power Turbine Services Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1697
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1697
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment and if it complied with the statutory requirements for such agreements. This included ensuring that the agreement met the criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009, which requires agreements to be in the best interests of the employees and to provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The Fair Work Commission considered various aspects of the agreement, including wage rates, working hours, and conditions of employment. It was determined that the proposed agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, taking into account the specific needs of the industry and the workforce. The agreement was found to meet all necessary legislative requirements and was therefore approved. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions of employment are fair and reasonable, providing a stable and predictable work environment for the employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.