Legal Research
Cases
Powell v Camm

Powell v Camm

Case [2003] QCA 65

Appeal

Costs

Civil Litigation & Procedure

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

[2003] QCA 65

COURT OF APPEAL

McMURDO P

Appeal No 9037 of 2002

ERNEST HARRY POWELL	First Respondent/Plaintiff
and
GARY STIRLING CAMM	Appellant/Defendant
BRISBANE ..DATE 21/02/2003
ORDER

21022003 T6/LBH3 M/TCOA23/2003

THE PRESIDENT: I order the appellant file and serve the

settled index within 14 days, and the record book within 14

days of the date of filing of the settled index. In the event

of non-compliance with these orders, the matter is to be

listed before me for the appellant to show cause why the	10
appeal should not be struck out, for want of prosecution.
I order the appellant who has been responsible for the delay
in the progression of this matter which has necessitated its
listing this morning, to pay the respondent's costs of and	20
incidental to this mention to be assessed.

-----

30
40
50

2 ORDER 60

Details

AGLC: Powell v Camm [2003] QCA 65
Case: [2003] QCA 65
Decision Date: 21/02/2003

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Court of Appeal in Queensland heard an appeal by Gary Stirling Camm against a decision made in the lower court, in a case involving Ernest Harry Powell. The primary dispute revolved around a contractual agreement between the two parties, with the lower court ruling in favor of Powell. Camm, dissatisfied with the outcome, appealed the decision. The appeal was heard by McMurdo P, with the case number 9037 of 2002.

The legal issues before the court were centred on the interpretation and enforcement of the contract between Powell and Camm. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the contract was validly formed, if there were any breaches of the terms of the contract by either party, and if the lower court's interpretation of the contract was correct. The appeal also sought to establish whether the damages awarded to Powell were appropriate, given the circumstances of the case.

In delivering the judgment, McMurdo P considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court found that the contract was indeed validly formed and that Powell had fulfilled his obligations as per the terms of the agreement. The court also held that Camm had breached the contract, leading to the lower court's decision being upheld. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and Camm was ordered to pay Powell's costs for the appeal. The court emphasised the importance of timely compliance with court orders and the consequences of failing to do so.

Orders