Potier v R
Case
•
[2011] NSWCCA 204
•06 September 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Potier v R [2011] NSWCCA 204
[2011] NSWCCA 204
06 September 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant in this matter was appealing against the decision of a judge of the Court of Criminal Appeal to dismiss an application for bail. The matter involved a review of a decision of a primary judge to refuse bail to the appellant pending appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal. The legal issues before the court were whether the primary judge was sitting in the Court of Criminal Appeal when he made the bail determination, and whether the court had the power to grant bail or to review the bail determination of the primary judge.
The court considered the relevant statutory provisions, including the Bail Act 1979 (NSW) and the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW). The court found that the primary judge was sitting in the Court of Criminal Appeal when he made the bail determination, and therefore had the power to grant bail or to review the bail determination of the primary judge. The court also considered the meaning of "special and exceptional circumstances" under section 30AA of the Bail Act, and found that the primary judge had not erred in his assessment of the bail application. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary judge to refuse bail to the appellant.
The final orders of the court were that the appeal be dismissed and that the appellant remain in custody. The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that there were special and exceptional circumstances that warranted the grant of bail pending appeal. The court also found that the primary judge had not erred in his assessment of the bail application, and that the decision to refuse bail was a reasonable one in the circumstances.
The court considered the relevant statutory provisions, including the Bail Act 1979 (NSW) and the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW). The court found that the primary judge was sitting in the Court of Criminal Appeal when he made the bail determination, and therefore had the power to grant bail or to review the bail determination of the primary judge. The court also considered the meaning of "special and exceptional circumstances" under section 30AA of the Bail Act, and found that the primary judge had not erred in his assessment of the bail application. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary judge to refuse bail to the appellant.
The final orders of the court were that the appeal be dismissed and that the appellant remain in custody. The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that there were special and exceptional circumstances that warranted the grant of bail pending appeal. The court also found that the primary judge had not erred in his assessment of the bail application, and that the decision to refuse bail was a reasonable one in the circumstances.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Bail
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Potier v R [2011] NSWCCA 204
Most Recent Citation
Potier v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 177
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Potier v State of New South Wales
[2014] NSWCA 359
R v Potier
[2014] NSWSC 131
Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Potier
[2014] NSWSC 118
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
5
Potier v R
[2010] NSWCCA 234
Regina v Malcolm Potier
[2011] NSWCCA 170
Potier v R
[2006] NSWCCA 27