Porteous v Pharmacy Board of Australia (No 2)
Case
•
[2021] QCAT 390
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Porteous v Pharmacy Board of Australia (No 2) [2021] QCAT 390
[2021] QCAT 390
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Regina Porteous brought an application against the Pharmacy Board of Australia to review the Board's decision to suspend her registration. The Tribunal set aside the Board's decision and each party now makes a submission in relation to costs. The applicant seeks costs and the Board submits that the usual order be made, that is that each party pay its own cost. The Tribunal considered the application on the papers and found in favour of the applicant. The applicant now seeks an order that the Board pay her costs, and the Board submits that each party bear its own costs. The relevant statutory provisions and authorities were considered. The Tribunal found that there was no basis to depart from the usual order that each party bear its own costs. The Tribunal ordered that each party bear its own costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Health Law
Legal Concepts
-
Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Legitimate Expectation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Crime and Corruption Commission v NDZ [2024] QCAT 21
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Fox v Queensland Building and Construction Commission
[2024] QCAT 456
Munro, Jenny Applicant v Physiotherapy Board of Australia
[2024] QCAT 247
Crime and Corruption Commission v NDZ
[2024] QCAT 21
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Tamawood Ltd v Paans
[2005] QCA 111
Porteous v Pharmacy Board of Australia
[2021] QCAT 286
Kehl v Board of Professional Engineers of Queensland
[2010] QCATA 77