Porte and Rahma and Ors (No. 2)

In *Porte and Rahma and Ors (No. 2)*, heard by Brown J, the proceedings involved parties including S Corporation Pty. Ltd. (Receivers & Managers appointed) (In Liquidation), who sought leave to intervene. The dispute concerned applications that were adjourned pending further proceedings.

The court was required to determine whether to grant leave for S Corporation Pty. Ltd. to intervene in the proceedings. Additionally, the court considered an application by the first respondent for leave to withdraw a previously filed response and to file an amended response.

Brown J granted leave for S Corporation Pty. Ltd. to intervene. The court also granted the first respondent leave to withdraw its response filed on 7 August 2009 and to file an amended response on the day of the hearing. All other extant applications were adjourned to 17 August 2009. The court further ordered that the reasons for judgment be transcribed and made available to the parties, and that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel and solicitors appearing as counsel, pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004.